The U.S., like any large empire, has certainly experienced dark moments. But when the enemies are within, dark moments without extreme bloodshed can seem just as bleak as those involving extreme loss of life.
Such is the case today.
An American President was hit late last night with convincing evidence issued by legislators that he raped several women and that his personal attorney, now the chief prosecuting lawyer of the United States as the Attorney General, has consistently covered up evidence, meaning he, too, is actively committing crimes against the American people.
And the New York Times has so far ignored it in this morning’s New York Times:
The maddening thing about the New York Times is that it employs several journalists who expose all kinds of horrors. But the newspaper’s editors and publishers continue to sanewash Trump and refuse to cover his most odious character traits.
This damages the reputation of those who toil for them. It’s extremely unfair to the good reporters at that paper who bust their asses to reveal other headline grabbers.
It often seems that the editors and journalists who work for them are wildly out of sync.
I’m starting to wonder who is slipping money under the door of the publishers and editors in the middle of the night.
The Allegations
Perhaps their excuse is that the allegations aren’t new. Well, some are, but gosh, the dude has racked up so many sexual assault allegations, what’s one more?
Last night’s release by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee might seem like a political ploy given the season: we’re late in the Midterms election cycle. Let’s drop a few fireballs.
And, hey, maybe the timing of that is by design. Who cares? The document is full of testimony and evidence that points to the very likely reality that we are being governed by an extremist band of sexual perverts who don’t care at all about the best interests of this nation.
The carousel of grift seems almost designed to provide cover to a crime family and its henchman in case the worst (for them) happens during these Midterms and beyond.
But you know what? If Trump has even a spark left in that withered stump of a brain stem of his, he’s in negotiations with Vlad Putin right now on an escape plan to a pervy dacha on the Black Sea near Gelendzhik, Krasnodar Krai, Russia.

Here’s why (quoted directly from the document released last night):
Of the 11 women who tie Donald Trump to Epstein’s sex trafficking operation, five of them—Beatrice Keul, Stacey Williams, Jill Harth, Katie Johnson, and a Jane Doe—have directly accused Trump of raping or sexually assaulting them in Epstein’s company or direct physical presence:
Beatrice Keul, whose account is comprehensively set forth for the first time in this report, credibly alleges that Trump violently raped her at a November 1993 pageant at the Plaza Hotel in New York City and that Epstein, Trump, and others used this pageant as a “hunting ground” to prey on vulnerable young women and girls;
Stacey Williams, who offered a detailed and corroborated account of Trump sexually assaulting her in the early 1990s while she was alone with him and Epstein in an office at Trump Tower;
Jill Harth, who has also publicly detailed Trump aggressively pursuing and violently sexually assaulting her and another woman in 1994 at a Mar-a-Lago party where Epstein and Trump were the only men present;
Katie Johnson, who gave FBI a detailed account of her repeated rape at the hands of Trump and Epstein in 1994 in New York City when she was a minor; and
A Jane Doe, who offered FBI a graphic account of Trump assaulting her when she was a minor in the mid-1980s in New York by forcibly pushing her head down to his exposed penis.
The new allegation, one that the Times apparently didn’t see the need to cover in any substantive way, is the case of Beatrice Keul. It’s worth repeating, over and over, what the report says about this new allegation:
Beatrice Keul credibly alleges that Trump violently raped her at a November 1993 pageant at the Plaza Hotel in New York City and that Epstein, Trump, and others used this pageant as a “hunting ground” to prey on vulnerable young women and girls.
A hunting ground.
Violently raped.
Vulnerable women and girls.
Hello, Cornell.
The New York Times probably does have a story on this. Somewhere. It didn’t show up in my email feed, and it isn’t on the front page of their website as I write this.
The top headline on their website should look like this:
This is the story of our times. It is the news story of the century. Full stop. Nothing else comes close. It should be front and center every day.
They covered Watergate every day for months. In comparison to the Epstein scandal, Watergate was nothing more than a few drunk campaign aides tipping over a vending machine to snag some free Zapp’s voodoo potato chips.
If the new accusation was a siloed event, I could understand a modicum of skepticism on the part of editors. If it was the first time someone has come forward and it feels like an October surprise? Sure, I can understand some hesitation. Politics being politics, and all that.
But Trump has faced a litany of credible accusations ever since he appeared on the public scene. He was recorded years ago flirting with preteen girls on an escalator. It wasn’t some spurious claim by a disgruntled aide. It was a recording.
He admitted to “grabbing pussy” to an entertainment bozo with a tape recorder. E. Jean Carroll has been kicking his ass all over the planet for his attempt to cover up the truth behind his sexual assault against her. He failed at that, and the Supreme Court told him to pay up. There’s a court record of this. He sexually assaulted Ms. Carroll and spent years trying to cover it up.
The new accusation in this report didn’t appear out of a vacuum. Neither will the next. Todd Blanche, the cover-up expert of all time, must use AI to keep up with the dizzying litany of sexual assault charges against this grotesque, inhuman, bipedal pile of orange toxic sludge.
More from the report:
Beyond these direct allegations of physical assault, three survivors speak of encounters with Trump whose circumstances indicate that he was a participant in Epstein’s crimes, as shown by how Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, tried to make (or made) these women available for sex.
Two Epstein survivors—“Jane” and “Kate”—told FBI that either Epstein or Maxwell seemingly offered them up to Trump for the purposes of sex or indicated their availability. Jane and Kate were deemed so credible that federal prosecutors called them to testify as government witnesses—subject to probing cross-examination—against Ghislaine Maxwell at her criminal trial.
Another survivor, Maria Farmer, described how Epstein had to actively prevent Trump from preying on her late at night after Trump confused her with a teenage girl potentially victimized by Epstein.
Read that last line again:
Maria Farmer described how Epstein had to actively prevent Trump from preying on her late at night after Trump confused her with a teenage girl potentially victimized by Epstein.
Epstein had to actively prevent Trump from preying on someone he thought was a teenager.
Epstein is the one who had to slow Trump’s roll? Really????? How was this not the first thing out of every American anchor person’s mouth this morning?
This report is full of enough headlines to keep New York Times headline writers busy every day for the next two years.
Each of the allegations in this report deserves its own headline. Every single one should be front and center of the news cycle. Not just with the New York Times, but CNN, Fox, yes, Fox, and everyone who cares about what should be the most basic, simple law of morality known to humans: a woman’s body is sacrosanct and is not a plaything for boys or men.
This is not a complicated topic. This should not be something open to debate, no matter what podcast bros say to each other during their endless misogyny fests.
The same media entities that covered Cornell (as they should have) are ignoring the same kinds of allegations against a U.S. President.
Why? Who is paying them off? Just how deep is this Epstein crime ring? Does it include editors and publishers?
Well. Of course it does.
Else, they’d not be so damn gun shy about covering it.
Kate’s story is particularly suggestive of Trump’s active involvement in Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Her FBI witness interview, released in the Epstein files, details how Ghislaine Maxwell took her to a party in New York where Maxwell “presented” Kate to Trump.
Kate, a young model, remarked that this was the same way Maxwell “introduced [Kate] to Epstein.”
Another document in the file confirms that Maxwell set Kate up on a date with Trump, and other sources show Maxwell, Trump, and Kate then traveled together on Trump’s private jet to Florida.
Maxwell’s role of introducing young women to Trump was so well known that a tabloid covered it in 1997, remarking how Trump was friends with “Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine, who has introduced several of her attractive friends to the property developer.”
1997
That’s how long mainstream media has been dancing around the Epstein/Trump crime spree.
If this reminds you of something else I wrote recently, glass clink.
What If I Told You That Trump Has Been a Special Agent for Russia Since the 1980s?
You may have heard about Trump’s latest act of treason, this one involving violating U.S. sanctions against Russia by working out (supposedly) a deal for Russian diesel fuel.
In one case, Epstein joked perversely that he sold “a fully depreciated woman” to Trump.
Trump views women as chattel. News at ten.
The report goes on to detail how Todd Blanche, Trump’s official cover-up boy toy, has used the Department of Justice as Trump’s personal law firm to cover this scandal up.
It’s the crime of the century.
But the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media keep ignoring it.
Notes
Here is the full House report on these scumbags (PDF):
Thanks for reading!

You can now purchase a PDF of all my Substack Fiction. Only $4.99. That’s less than a Starbucks Venti Latte. It’s a lot more enjoyable to read than Trump’s vomit-inducing behavior.
Enter SUBSCRIBER_SPECIAL to get a 20 percent discount.
It’s also now available on Amazon/Kindle in ebook, paperback, and hardcover formats (the Kindle version is free if you have Kindle Unlimited):
If you are a paid subscriber, it’s available free as a Perk. Just go to the “Perks” page via the web page menu to find it.
You can help me reach more people by subscribing (paid or free), sharing, restacking, and commenting.







