I Don't Care How Many MAGA Women There Are
It doesn't matter. They'll all go away when we deMAGAnatize men
This society is so misogynistic that many on the left say things like, “What is wrong with these MAGA women?”
Hey, I’ve done it, too. I’m not trying to throw shade.

We chide Kristi Noem for her extensions, or Marjorie Taylor Greene for her off-white alpaca wool coat, before attacking their policies and statements. In other words, I rarely read a criticism of a MAGA woman that doesn’t include a jab about her appearance.
To be fair, this also happens with some of the men in the regime, especially the master Magat, but aside from him, it usually feels less noxious (and in his case, it’s so well-earned that it almost seems restrained).
But this is not an admonishment to be kinder to the MAGA women who have found their way into the bowels of the world’s worst regime.1
Instead, it’s a reminder that the MAGA world is designed to be led by men. When women show up, they’re usually the first to be thrown under the bus when things go awry.
Although some women in the magat circle are true believers in that weird, Christo-nationalist kind of way, most of them are simply career opportunists. They are without the passion of true hate that drives the MAGA train.
We often see the phrase, “The cruelty is the point,” when the regime perpetrates another of its crimes against the American people. At the heart of that cruelty is hate.
The hate mechanism, the ugliness of the personality that is lured to leadership positions in MAGA, which, in the end, are not leadership positions at all, but merely sergeants-at-arms for the biggest asshole in the history of American politics, drives everything.
Behind that mechanism is a cabal of mostly white men and their occasional DEI hire. Their use of the DEI concept, the token “person of color” or woman within their regime, is a perverse dichotomy, but in the end, I try to leave those DEI hires out of the discussion whenever I can.
Yes, Kashyap Patel is an idiot, but he’d be a barely functional ambulance chaser somewhere in Florida if not for a regime that continually places a former federal prosecutor with a history of lying in positions of importance.
Per Wikipedia:
“Patel served temporarily as a representative for the Criminal Division on the case against the perpetrators of the 2012 Benghazi attack, but he was removed over disagreements he had with the office leading the case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Later, he claimed he had been the case’s lead prosecutor. According to The Atlantic, former colleagues said the U.S. Attorney’s Office led the prosecution, not Patel.
“In his memoir, Patel wrote that he had been asked to join the trial team against Ahmed Abu Khattala, a militia leader in the Libyan civil war. According to The New York Times, he was not offered that position.”
This is true about the irony of most of their DEI hires. They’re usually uniquely unqualified for the jobs they are assigned.
Consider Lindsey Halligan. Remember her?
A judge said that she was “masquerading as an attorney” in January 2026, not long after the regime appointed her to a U.S. attorney post in the Eastern District of Virginia and tasked her with persecuting2 former FBI chief James Comey.3
Before her appointment, her case law involved work as an insurance attorney. She had no prosecutorial experience anywhere. That same judge said that she unlawfully held the position.
Halligan’s sole qualification was as a Trump loyalist, just like Alina Habba, who was disqualified from a similar position the previous December. Habba, another Trump sycophant, was disqualified as a U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey in December for a similar lack of qualifications.
This twisted form of DEI hire is a common thread throughout the regime, from Pam Bondi to Kristi Noem to Tulsi Gabbard.
When someone like Pam Bondi commits overt crimes like covering up the most horrific sex scandal in the history of the U.S. presidency, we obviously need to call her out. But her replacement is doing the same thing.
And he’s even worse than Bondi. Todd Blanche was Trump’s personal attorney. He still acts in that capacity as “Acting” Attorney General, a position that is supposed to be vetted by Congress.
Blanche long ago declared the Epstein matter closed and has done nothing to bring justice for Epstein survivors.
Everything comes from the top, and the top is a white male hierarchy with a laser focus on cruelty.
When Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, and other women are inevitably thrown under the bus for the regime’s terrible policies and implementation errors, nothing changes, and sometimes things get worse.
The only woman who seems to remain unscathed is Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, who seems to be filled with more testosterone than Trump himself.
Ironically, she therefore makes my whole post moot. Because if you’re wondering how Trump manages to issue his various edicts when his mind is nothing but a slurry of processed Big Mac detritus, you need look no further than the most powerful female career opportunist in America.
Happy Father's Day to those who celebrate!
Thanks for reading!
Footnotes
One could argue, of course, that there are many worse regimes. Technically, there are, if your scale is weighted exclusively by specific actions. The Islamic Republic of Iran certainly comes to mind, as does the Taliban of Afghanistan, Israel’s Netanyahu, and Putin’s Russia. But none of these currently have the same impact as the infestation crawling around the White House.
“persecution” is often interchangeable with “prosecution” when considering this regime.
Reilly, Ryan J, and Dareh Gregorian. “Lindsey Halligan No Longer Employed by Justice Department after Departure from Virginia U.S. Attorney’s Office.” NBC News, January 26, 2026. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/lindsey-halligan-not-employed-justice-department-us-attorney-rcna255969.



Wiles is very much the opportunist, having jumped ship from DeSatan to Drumpf. As for her level of testosterone, you might be correct, as her level probably is similar to that which Margaret Thatcher had. But to compare it to Drumpf’s is too easy - one look at him (I know, once is too many) and it’s obvious he’s physically an easy candidate for all the “low-T” quack products and store front clinics. I do have one other explanation for the motivation of some MAGAt women - some are tunnel vision, single issue driven, usually unChristian-nationalists that are pro-birth. If they weren’t panting up Drumpf’s leg, they would have been at a Charlie Kirk rally with their MAGAt boyfriend. Same can be said for single issue gun rights loving females, such as Noem. Then again, some just want to be Barbie like trophy wives and MAGAt men appeal to them. Getting back to Wiles, maybe she’s Drumpf’s mommy fixture, giving him the attention he wanted from his own mother but never received.
Great comment:-).
I do believe that No Trump = No Charlie Kirk. It will be interesting to see what happens to MAGA after he dies. Unfortunately, he's left behind seeds.