I had one of my funniest gaffes on this one. The email version of this will refer to Stephen Miller as Stephen King. Although Stephen Miller could very easily be a villain from one of King's more frightening novels (which is probably why that entered my brain), it is not fair to refer to the author of horror fiction in a way that suggests he's a nasty character like one of his bad guys.
And that same NYT publishes an article on 1/14 of this year interviewing 11 Pro Trump supporters who are by and large, pleased with what he's doing. They are a bit skeptical about Greenland and Venezuela, but everything else is A-OK with them. This is where our problem lies.
No argument there. That’s one of my biggest points of contention with them. The only thing I regret is when I miss their promotion of articles like that on BlueSky so I can hammer them with one of my alternative (corrected) headlines.
I had one of my funniest gaffes on this one. The email version of this will refer to Stephen Miller as Stephen King. Although Stephen Miller could very easily be a villain from one of King's more frightening novels (which is probably why that entered my brain), it is not fair to refer to the author of horror fiction in a way that suggests he's a nasty character like one of his bad guys.
I was shocked to see that, but then I realized you inadvertently typed ‘King’ instead of ‘Miller’.
Probably all those Nosferatu/Miller references were dancing in my head. Among all the other calamities going on in my stricken mind. :-)
And that same NYT publishes an article on 1/14 of this year interviewing 11 Pro Trump supporters who are by and large, pleased with what he's doing. They are a bit skeptical about Greenland and Venezuela, but everything else is A-OK with them. This is where our problem lies.
No argument there. That’s one of my biggest points of contention with them. The only thing I regret is when I miss their promotion of articles like that on BlueSky so I can hammer them with one of my alternative (corrected) headlines.