Discussion about this post

User's avatar
RNDM31's avatar

The US has bit of a habit installing 'friends' who due to being screw-ups eventually get overthrown or otherwise replaced by someone *decidedly* less accommodating, doesn't it?

Wild Lion*esses Pride by Jay's avatar

Charles, the Mossadegh biography alone earned the read — and the Kermit Roosevelt thread pulls the whole architecture into clear, unsparing focus.

I grew up knowing the broad strokes of Iranian history — Persia, as the people themselves prefer — and watched the Shah’s unraveling in real time as a teenager in Germany. The granular detail of the Anglo-Persian Agreement, the constitutional trickery around Zahedi, the CIA’s own report calling the first coup attempt an abject collapse — those layers sharpened something I carried as vague outrage into actual documented fury.

Every convulsion since 1953 traces to one decision: Western powers decided Iranian oil belonged to them, hired someone to dismantle a functioning democracy, and handed the rubble to fundamentalists. The ayatollahs rose from the rubble, full stop.

130 years of Western meddling runs on one engine — money, power, control over natural resources. Dress it in anticommunism, counterterrorism, regional stability — the fuel stays the same. Persia paid. Its people keep paying.

24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?