Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael G's avatar

I concur with your research findings on Mary Magdalene and the Gospel that was dropped from the final text as published. As for your historical fiction account of young child Jesus, I started visualizing something here along the same lines, but with a different modern twist - I see this small child Jesus as an early version of a smarta$$, but better well spoken biblical B*rt S!mpson [legal staff told me to be careful of copyright infringement and big lawsuit] with M*rv@l Comic superpowers [again that damn legal staff]. But maybe I just missed that Christmas episode.

Slightly off topic, but regarding Jesus and Joseph, the artistic depiction of both men vary widely amongst the great painters of the 15th through 17th centuries, whose paintings adorn the walls of Catholic churches throughout Europe and American museums. Joseph, as depicted in scenes with the infant Jesus varies from a teenager (as likely the Virgin Mary was) to an older middle age man with a long brown beard and in some cases balding with a grey beard. Jesus as an adult is shown as any where from thin to muscle man Jesus, totally ripped hitting the gym daily. I suspect the former based on the nutrition of the day.

EllenPepper's avatar

Thank you for this. It all makes perfect senses.

Of course, being in a child's body would having him behaving like a child and relishing - with abandon - the powers he came in with.

Of course, he'd need to learn humility and empathy as part of being in a human body.

I read that he eventually studied with Masters in India. That would explain the years he went missing and his philosophical growth.

“This boy is not of this earth; he can even tame fire. Perhaps he was born before the creation of the world."

That's it in a nutshell.

An intriguing read, Charles.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?