I'm a big fan of the free version. Just yesterday I ran a legal document through my chat and asked it to check for typos. (Another human had indicated that they saw a typo), the chat found multiple errors! I politely let the good attorney handling the water spring deed know of the errors before recording. I'll probably pay when the time comes.
If I was an attorney, I’d definitely use it. I imagine it’s really helpful for legal research, too, as long as you check its work. But even if you have to take the time to check its work, it must be a big time saver. I know other people who use it, too, for research. One of those people is me. But I check everything. I use Grammarly for spell check. That’s basically AI.
I do not use it for writing fiction or essays. That’s lame, and it’s what I object to.
When it comes to people using AI for writing, I believe AI is dumbing down and dulling the senses of people who use it for that purpose. It makes people lazy.
AI cannot write about my personal feelings about a situation or my memories and moments.
I have used AI for proofreading...and even then I don’t use it all of the time. (Just ask Cliff about my typos and grammatical errors, lol.)
I have used AI for alt text to save time with weather posts, but the wording gets silly at times.
AI is priceless if you want to whip up a picture of a gorilla smoking a cigar while wearing a top hat and playing poker. 😂
It's good for assessing veracity in science writing and trying to understand chronic women's medical issues that physicians have no training in. I've found I'm better at typos.
To be honest, I’m 86, and I have no idea how AI works, and have no reason to use it. This article was Greek to me. I’m sure others find it illuminating, but there are still things on my phone that I need my daughter’s help with.
I'm a big fan of the free version. Just yesterday I ran a legal document through my chat and asked it to check for typos. (Another human had indicated that they saw a typo), the chat found multiple errors! I politely let the good attorney handling the water spring deed know of the errors before recording. I'll probably pay when the time comes.
If I was an attorney, I’d definitely use it. I imagine it’s really helpful for legal research, too, as long as you check its work. But even if you have to take the time to check its work, it must be a big time saver. I know other people who use it, too, for research. One of those people is me. But I check everything. I use Grammarly for spell check. That’s basically AI.
I do not use it for writing fiction or essays. That’s lame, and it’s what I object to.
When it comes to people using AI for writing, I believe AI is dumbing down and dulling the senses of people who use it for that purpose. It makes people lazy.
AI cannot write about my personal feelings about a situation or my memories and moments.
I have used AI for proofreading...and even then I don’t use it all of the time. (Just ask Cliff about my typos and grammatical errors, lol.)
I have used AI for alt text to save time with weather posts, but the wording gets silly at times.
AI is priceless if you want to whip up a picture of a gorilla smoking a cigar while wearing a top hat and playing poker. 😂
It's good for assessing veracity in science writing and trying to understand chronic women's medical issues that physicians have no training in. I've found I'm better at typos.
To be honest, I’m 86, and I have no idea how AI works, and have no reason to use it. This article was Greek to me. I’m sure others find it illuminating, but there are still things on my phone that I need my daughter’s help with.
Many things about newer phones are a mystery to me too! I'm clinging to my iPhone 8. I know it and it knows me. lol
I have an iPhone 15, and do fairly well with it, but there are still things I don’t know. My family understands, so I’m good.
Charles, you write like a human being. AI can't compete with you. lol